The key problem with this move is that ‘righteous’ does not mean ‘family member’, but rather ‘in line with a standard’-and in the forensic context of justification, the standards in view are the moral standards of the created order. 1 As a result, Wright’s theology of justification shows less interest in the moral standing of creature before creator, and becomes anchored instead in what he sees as being a more fundamental concept-the human community of God’s covenant people. This profoundly affects his definition of ‘justification’, which, he claims, really means to ‘receive the verdict “member of the family”’. Tom Wright, for example, claims that in Galatians, ‘righteousness’ really means ‘membership of God’s family’, not ‘being in line with a legal and/or moral standard’, as we saw in the previous post. However, they use a different definition of the term ‘righteous’. They will agree that ‘to justify’ means ‘to declare righteous’. It was one of the great rediscoveries of the Reformation that justification means ‘to declare righteous’ in the forensic context, not ‘to make righteous’.Ī number of modern writers make a different error. On this understanding, justification is a process that takes place in the life of a person, conforming the person to God’s moral standards over a period of time. One serious error, made by many theologians in both the medieval Catholic church and also the modern Roman Catholic church, is to assert that ‘to justify’ means ‘to make righteous’ rather than ‘to declare righteous’.
Just briefly, here are two fundamental errors that have occurred in understanding the biblical word ‘justification’. To justify = to declare that a person is indeed righteous (usually in a law court). If a man sins against his neighbor and is made to take an oath and comes and swears his oath before your altar in this house, then hear from heaven and act and judge your servants, repaying the guilty by bringing his conduct on his own head, and vindicating the righteous by rewarding him according to his righteousness. In the Old Testament, we see God’s heavenly law court ‘coming to earth’ in the temple: In fact, God’s justification of the righteous is one of the key activities that take place in the temple in Jerusalem. Keep far from a false charge, and do not kill the innocent and righteous, for I will not acquit the wicked. You shall not pervert the justice due to your poor in his lawsuit. God hates those who justify the wicked and condemn the righteous. It is possible, therefore, for a human law court to justify a person who is not righteous-that is, to declare that somebody is righteous when they are not righteous at all (e.g. Sometimes the judges themselves are unrighteous, and so make false judgements. However, human law courts are not perfect. If there is a dispute between men and they come into court and the judges decide between them, acquitting the innocent and condemning the guilty … ( Deut 25:1) God’s justification versus human justification If the defendant, on the basis of evidence, is deemed to have indeed been righteous, then the judge ‘justifies’ them-that is, the judge declares that they are righteous. The job of the law court is to examine the defendant, to compare the evidence of their behaviour against the righteous standards of the law (which are based upon the moral created order established by God himself), and then to determine whether or not the defendant has acted in such a way as to show that he or she is in line with those standards. While righteousness (or unrighteousness) is generally a quality the defendant possesses upon entry to the law court, ‘justification’ is an action that happens in the law court itself. The word translated ‘to justify’, ‘justification’ and ‘justified’ occur almost exclusively in the forensic (law court) context in the Bible. In fact, in the original Hebrew and Greek languages (in which the Bible was written), the word for ‘justification’ has the same basic root as the words for ‘righteousness’. The word ‘justification’ is very closely related to ‘righteousness’ in the forensic context. Righteousness of a judge = making decisions in line with legal and/or moral standards. Righteousness of a defendant = being in line with a legal and/or moral standard.
In the second post, we saw that there is a particularly important context in which the word ‘righteousness’ appears: the law court. Righteousness = being in line with a standard.
Today we’ll learn the basic meaning of the word ‘justification’.
Define the wordpower in the greek series#
This post is the third in a series designed to help you to get to know and love some of the important words used in the Bible.
0 kommentar(er)
